Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #2678Re: Amiga vs. Atari ST
From: Evan Mitchell
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1989 15:43
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1989 15:43
22 lines
1686 bytes
1686 bytes
In article <89072707200427@masnet.uucp> david.megginson@canremote.uucp (DAVID MEGGINSON) writes: >I suggest that you look at the software as well as the computer itself. >Consider Calamus and DynaCadd on the ST, and compare them to whatever is >available on the Amiga. >--- > * Via ProDoor 3.0R This is true. However, consider Professional Page (full Postscript color seperations (4096 soon to be 16 mil)) and X-Cad. And remember you can run both of them at the same time, and you can add an '030 to your system (A2000 without hacking) and a math co-processor (68882) and lots of good NTSC compatible video software available, and... Don't kid yourself, this isn't an easy choice. I chose to go with the company with the least amount of vaporware... -Evan _______________________________________________________________________________ | Evan Jay Mitchell EECS/ERL Industrial Liaison Program | | mitchell@janus.berkeley.edu University of California at Berkeley | | Phone: (415) 643-6687 | | "Think, it ain't illegal...yet!" - George Clinton | |_____________________________________________________________________________|
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<30254@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!ucbvax!janus!mitchellReferences:
<89072707200427@masnet.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!ucbvax!janus!mitchell From: mitchell@janus.uucp (Evan Mitchell) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Amiga vs. Atari ST Message-ID: <30254@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: 28 Jul 89 15:43:19 GMT References: <89072707200427@masnet.uucp> Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: mitchell@janus.UUCP (Evan Mitchell) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 22