Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #26900Re: Megamax inline assembly woes (solution)
From: Dave Allum
Date: Mon, 18 May 1987 08:15
Date: Mon, 18 May 1987 08:15
14 lines
1285 bytes
1285 bytes
In article <8705120723.AA17281@cory.Berkeley.EDU> dillon@CORY.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon) writes:
>:Declaring variables both at the top of a function and in a loop:
>: while ( condition ) {
>: register char *cp; /* <<< megamax won't allow this */
>: }
> This is standard C. If megamax doesn't allow it, megamax shouldn't
>be on the shelves. Every major programmer I know uses this construction.
Megemax _does_ allow this - just checked it out (must confess I didn't
realise it was standard C until now). I have V1.1 so I guess it could
have been a problem with the earlier release. Anyone still on V1
care to check it?
Dave Allum.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1155@bath63.ux63.bath.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mcvax!ukc!dcl-cs!bath63!sc_draReferences:
<8705120723.AA17281@cory.Berkeley.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mcvax!ukc!dcl-cs!bath63!sc_dra From: sc_dra@ux63.bath.ac.uk (Dave Allum) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Megamax inline assembly woes (solution) Message-ID: <1155@bath63.ux63.bath.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 18-May-87 04:15:25 EDT Article-I.D.: bath63.1155 Posted: Mon May 18 04:15:25 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 20-May-87 03:29:08 EDT References: <8705120723.AA17281@cory.Berkeley.EDU> Reply-To: sc_dra@ux63.bath.ac.uk (Dave Allum) Organization: SWURCC, University of Bath, UK Lines: 14 Summary: Declaration in loop allowed by Megamax