Re: UniTerm DOES run on the Mega-ST's (and some more experiences)

Article View: comp.sys.atari.st

Article #27796

#27796

From: braner
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1987 17:54

12 lines
1203 bytes

[]

I believe the soldered-in 68000 in the Mega-ST is worse than the lack
of the blitter.  A socketed 68000 would, at an extra cost of about
50 cents to Atari, allow much easier upgrading of the machine, both
to use other CPU's (68020) and coprocessors (68881) _and_ the retrofitting
of a blitter if it ever arrives.  The expansion socket is great, but
a socket for the CPU is almost like having _two_ expansion sockets!

Any more votes for Atari to hear?

- Moshe Braner

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1803@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!nysernic!itsgw!batcomputer!braner

References: <8707291248.AA20018@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!nysernic!itsgw!batcomputer!braner
From: braner@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu (braner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: UniTerm DOES run on the Mega-ST's (and some more experiences)
Message-ID: <1803@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu>
Date: Wed, 29-Jul-87 13:54:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: batcompu.1803
Posted: Wed Jul 29 13:54:05 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 31-Jul-87 05:04:20 EDT
References: <8707291248.AA20018@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: braner@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu (braner)
Distribution: world
Organization: Cornell Theory Center, Cornell University, Ithaca NY
Lines: 12
Summary: Socket that 68000, please?

Reply to Parent Message