Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #28257Re: GemDraw GemWrite
From: jsf
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1987 21:32
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1987 21:32
25 lines
1764 bytes
1764 bytes
In article <2182@ihlpf.ATT.COM> rtb@ihlpf.ATT.COM (Todd) writes:
>
>It seems obvious now that Gemwrite and GemDraw will never be
>available for the ST. I am posting this article because
>I am curious. Does anybody have any theories as to why these
>two programs died on the vine?
I have a copy of GEM WRITE for the ATARI ST from around July of 1985, before
the ST was widely available. It's quite buggy, and not really useable; but
it does seem to have most features implemented. I'm not sure why they never
finished it, but here are some possibilities:
1. Some of the top GEM developers at DRI left around that time to form
Ventura Software.
2. DRI and ATARI didn't seem to be getting along very well. I think this
has something to do with the fact that GEM on the ST wasn't completed
(no font support) or fully debugged. I've worked with GEM on the PC
as well as the ST, and have encountered ZERO bugs in the PC version.
3. Perhaps the DRI people had advance warning that ATARI was going to
give away free copies of First Word, thus killing the market for
third-party word processors.
-- Jeff Freedman
...hplabs!felix!jsf
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7420@felix.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!amdahl!oliveb!felix!jsfReferences:
<2182@ihlpf.ATT.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!amdahl!oliveb!felix!jsf From: jsf@felix.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: GemDraw GemWrite Message-ID: <7420@felix.UUCP> Date: Tue, 15-Sep-87 17:32:07 EDT Article-I.D.: felix.7420 Posted: Tue Sep 15 17:32:07 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 19-Sep-87 06:01:22 EDT References: <2182@ihlpf.ATT.COM> Sender: daemon@felix.UUCP Reply-To: jsf@felix.UUCP (Jeff Freedman) Organization: FileNet Corp., Costa Mesa, CA Lines: 25 Keywords: missing defunct why?