Re: More Performance Specs

Article View: comp.sys.atari.st

Article #2880

#2880

From: Lars-Erik 0sterud
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 1989 10:57

10 lines
830 bytes

I tried Quick-ST with and without blitter:

1)  No blitter, No Quick-ST  - SLowest
2)  Blitter                  - A bit faster GEM draw
3)  Quick-ST (no blitter)    - Even faster GEM draw
4)  Blitter AND Quick-ST     - Very very fast GEM draw !!!

  Lars-Erik 0sterud   /   Summer & Christmas:   /
   leoe@ifi.uio.no   /     f-leoe@ifi.uio.no   /
____________________/  _______________________/

Technical Details

Message-ID: <CMM.0.88.618404228.f-leoe@kyrre.uio.no>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!IFI.UIO.NO!f-leoe

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!IFI.UIO.NO!f-leoe
From: f-leoe@IFI.UIO.NO (Lars-Erik 0sterud)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: More Performance Specs
Message-ID: <CMM.0.88.618404228.f-leoe@kyrre.uio.no>
Date: 6 Aug 89 10:57:03 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 10
X-Unparsable-Date: Sun, 6 Aug 1989 12:57:08 MET DST