Re: Process control functions for dLibs

Article View: comp.sys.atari.st

Article #29087

#29087

From: ftw
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1987 15:17

13 lines
1027 bytes

I would vote for method two.  Since TOS can't multitask, it seems a little
dangerous to create a fork() function that doesn't quite work the way
one might "expect" it to.  I'd rather have method number two, which
is like vfork()/exec().


				Farrell T. Woods 

Datacube Inc. Systems / Software Group	4 Dearborn Rd. Peabody, Ma 01960
VOICE:	617-535-6644;	FAX: (617) 535-5643;  TWX: (710) 347-0125
INTERNET: ftw@datacube.COM
UUCP: {rutgers, ihnp4, mirror}!datacube!ftw

Technical Details

Message-ID: <105100025@datacube>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cca!mirror!datacube!ftw

References: <253@stag.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cca!mirror!datacube!ftw
From: ftw@datacube.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Process control functions for dLibs
Message-ID: <105100025@datacube>
Date: Thu, 5-Nov-87 10:17:00 EST
Article-I.D.: datacube.105100025
Posted: Thu Nov  5 10:17:00 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 8-Nov-87 13:10:31 EST
References: <253@stag.UUCP>
Lines: 13
Nf-ID: #R:stag.UUCP:-25300:datacube:105100025:000:468
Nf-From: datacube.UUCP!ftw    Nov  5 10:17:00 1987

Reply to Parent Message