Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #29116FILE I/O
From: J.NAGY
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1987 19:57
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1987 19:57
14 lines
1097 bytes
1097 bytes
The functions Fseek, fseek (and Fread, fread, Fwrite, fwrite, etc.)
seem to perform essentially equivalent functions. To do simple file
i/o, I could use the capital F's or the small f's to do essentially
the same things. Is there a prefered choice? How do you choose?
My inclination is to use the small f's since I'll end up with code
which is easier to port to a unix environment. Is there something subtle
going on here that I'm missing?
Thanks,
Jonathan Nagy
{ihnp4|allegra|harvard}!homxc!jdn
(201) 615-4349
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2023@homxc.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!labrea!rutgers!sri-spam!mordor!lll-tis!ptsfa!hoptoad!academ!killer!codas!mtune!whuts!homxb!homxc!jdnShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!labrea!rutgers!sri-spam!mordor!lll-tis!ptsfa!hoptoad!academ!killer!codas!mtune!whuts!homxb!homxc!jdn From: jdn@homxc.UUCP (J.NAGY) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: FILE I/O Message-ID: <2023@homxc.UUCP> Date: Thu, 5-Nov-87 14:57:56 EST Article-I.D.: homxc.2023 Posted: Thu Nov 5 14:57:56 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 10-Nov-87 06:31:40 EST Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Holmdel Lines: 14 Keywords: Mark Williams C, Fseek, fseek