🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <44e3d740.14a1f@gtephx.UUCP> covertr@gtephx.UUCP (Richard E. Covert) writes:
[stuff deleted]
>	I guess to summarize, I think that RTS/CTS should have been part of the
>basic design of DC PORT. I do not want to buy a DC PORT that was hacked up to 
>support RTS/CTS. And DC SOFTWARE needs to provide system software drivers, which
>run on all version of TOS, to support the RTS/CTS signals. If DC SOFTWARE could
>do this, then the DC PORT would be a smashing success. Until then, I will withold
>ordering one myself.
>
>	Thanks for the forum to discuss this product.
>Richard (gtephx!covertr) Covert
Jeezy Peezy...  Some people will never be happy.  DC Software has attempted
to make you, the customer, happy.  They have offered to go out of their
way to provide you with a board that will do what you want, but are you
grateful?  No, you would rather whine.  It's no wonder there aren't more
people supporting the ST out there.  I would like to thank DC Software
for their offer to modify a board for a special user request.  I hope
that DC Software remains in the ST market, and I hope that more developers
for the ST will be as willing to satisfy a specialized customer request.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin B. Clendenien                         kclenden@silver.bacs.indiana.edu
----------------------------------------------------------------------------