🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3243@umn-cs.cs.umn.edu> davidli@umn-cs.UUCP (Dave Meile) writes:
>Of course, you don't need multi-tasking to do either of the above jobs.
>A desk acessory does quite nicely (whether you're using an ST, Macintosh,
>PC or Amiga).

	...until your desk accessories start running into one another -
refusing to cohabit, wanting to grab off the same hotkeys, etc.

>The "average user" would be satisfied with a desk accessory, while the
>"power user" will want multi-tasking.

	...until they actually get to *use* a multitasking system, and
find out what they've been missing.

>Now, for the "Why I don't want a multi-tasking system".  (Of course, I have
>access to HUGE multi-user, multi-tasking systems at work...)
>
>I find that I get to do many little things around the house while I'm in
>a terminal session.  I can catch up on my reading, prepare dinner, change
>record albums, everything except un-ARC files I'm downloading (which is
>about the only thing I'd do if I owned a multi-tasking system).

	This reminds me of a cute article I saw recently. The author was
complaining about speedup boards on his IBM. No longer could he have
dinner while a program compiled - barely time for a cup of coffee.
	But for some of us, multitasking helps rather than hinders the
enjoyment of life. I do most of my compiling at the office - can't make
dinner there, or play records. But with multitasking I can listen to the
Amiga's music (DMCS) while I compile or, best of all, read the net :-).
Or both.
	You see? Your mistake is using multitasking to get more work
done!

-  From the Crow's Nest  -                      Kenn Barry
         QQQCLC                                 NASA-Ames Research Center
                                                Moffett Field, CA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTRIC AVENUE:	       {hplabs,seismo,dual,ihnp4}!ames!aurora!barry