Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #30005Re: WordPerfects???
From: Rich Dankert
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1988 07:57
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1988 07:57
56 lines
3002 bytes
3002 bytes
In article <8801081341.AA10025@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> gaspar@ALMSA-1.ARPA (Al Gaspar) writes:
>I've been considering WordPerfect, and I'm getting a little confused. It's as
>if there are two different WordPerfects.
Edited of course...
>
>What's the deal here? Are we talking about two different versions of
>WordPerfect for the ST here, is there a different version in Canada, or
>does Pavneet Arora use features that Rich Dankert doesn't? ? Can someone
>clarify? Also, some discussion of other peoples experiences would be great.
>
>And, yes, Virginia, there is such a thing as multi-tasking ;-).
>
>Cheers--
>
>Al
>
>--
>Al Gaspar <gaspar@almsa-1.arpa>
>USAMC ALMSA, ATTN: AMXAL-OW, Box 1578, St. Louis, MO 63188-1578
>COMMERCIAL: (314) 263-5118 AUTOVON: 693-5118
>uunet.uu.net!gaspar@almsa-1.arpa
I will reinterate again. I have had no problems with the version of
Word Perfect that I have. I use the program on an explanded 520 (1 meg) and
use a ramdisk in conjunction with it. I have yet to have *any data mixed up
or otherwise corrupted to date.
I use WP with my MonoChrome monitor and have yet to see it screw up
the display or any other such things that I have read in my travels about the
different services here in the usa. I have have nothing but good to say
about this product.
I have used it to pop out important documents to many places where
the way the document looks is 1/2 the battle. Of *all the W/Ps that I have
used this is the one that gave me an output to my printer that was perfect.
As far as getting updates from the CO. I cannot say that I have had
the need to do so. My program works great for me, so no need. The reason
for mentioning the CO.s backing is that others have had to get a bit of
help or have encountered a bug, and WP corp. has shipped them a different
program of the same version, and there bug was gone.
I can only say that *yes there are others that may use the program
and have problems with it, but I am not one of them. Of all the reports
that I have read, I am still looking for the same to happen to me, but
am plesently pleased to say that they have not, at least to this point.
I think the program is great, and worth the $$$ for everything that
you get.
UUCP: {Ihnp4,uwvax}!uwmcsd1!lakesys!rich
Discalimer: The words,ideas,and expressions are my own, and not nessasarily
always correct, and I have been know to be wrong.
I am not in any way or form tied into Word Perfect Corp. Just a very
satisfied customer.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<362@lakesys.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!cornell!rochester!bbn!uwmcsd1!lakesys!richReferences:
<8801081341.AA10025@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!cornell!rochester!bbn!uwmcsd1!lakesys!rich From: rich@lakesys.UUCP (Rich Dankert) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: WordPerfects??? Keywords: WP Message-ID: <362@lakesys.UUCP> Date: 9 Jan 88 07:57:01 GMT References: <8801081341.AA10025@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Reply-To: rich@lakesys.UUCP (Rich Dankert) Organization: Lake Systems, Milwaukee, WI Lines: 56