🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #3005

Re: 1Mbit DRAM Decoupling

#3005
From: John Logajan
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 1989 07:00
24 lines
1472 bytes
In article <3958@shlump.nac.dec.com>, landry@enginr.dec.com writes:
> 	     cap value(uf)	total voltage drop (mv) 
> 
> 		0.068			130
> 		0.1			115
> 		0.22			95
> 		0.33			85
> 		0.47			80

Consider that the threshold voltages for TTL levels are 0.8 and 2.4,
and closer to the rails for cmos -- then the difference between
0.115 and 0.085 (.03 volts) doesn't seem so bad.  I agree that the
noise margins are better for .33, but are they better enough?

As an aside, one our technology guys was telling me that bypass caps
of any size or type are virtually useless for eliminating the noise
components above about 300mhz.  Fortunately most logic is more prone to
lower frequency (lower than 300mhz!) glitches than to higher frequency
glitches -- after all, if it could respond that fast, people would use
it in their Cray's instead of their ST's.

-- 
- John M. Logajan @ Network Systems; 7600 Boone Ave; Brooklyn Park, MN 55428  -
- logajan@ns.network.com / ...rutgers!umn-cs!ns!logajan / john@logajan.mn.org -
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1541@ns.network.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!dptg!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!xanth!nic.MR.NET!ns!logajan
References: <3958@shlump.nac.dec.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!dptg!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!xanth!nic.MR.NET!ns!logajan
From: logajan@ns.network.com (John Logajan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: 1Mbit DRAM Decoupling
Message-ID: <1541@ns.network.com>
Date: 9 Aug 89 07:00:08 GMT
References: <3958@shlump.nac.dec.com>
Sender: logajan@ns.network.com (John Logajan)
Organization: Network Systems Corp. Mpls MN
Lines: 24