Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #30209Re: WordPerfects???
From: Rich Dankert
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1988 06:44
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1988 06:44
52 lines
3181 bytes
3181 bytes
In article <8801162346.AA18389@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> BRIGHT@DALAC.BITNET (BOB BRIGHT) writes:
>
> The truth, as usual, lies somewhere in between. The present incarnation
>of WP does have a number of bugs, though few of them are really "fatal".
>Most of them fall into the class of minor annoyances (such as the infamous
>"key-click" problem). One of the most serious, to my mind, is that WP
>doesn't clean up after itself properly when exiting -- at least the "Canadian
>version" :-) doesn't, running on a mono 1040 with nite and moustrap resident.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Just have a question here. Why the mousetrap program? The program
does allow the lockout of the menu bar, which may be the reason for the
not so clean break upon exit. Nite I can understand, to blank the screen
but another screen saver utl may solve the other problem your experiencing.
I must admit that I use WP from a cold boot, seeing that if i'm going
to be using it, I will be for some time,and when I exit the next program I
will most likly be using will be my terminal disk, though I do use the
terminal as a normal boot disk as it has my favorite .ACC's and ramdisk size.
Key click problem, well I can't say that I have encountered that
either, but then I don't have the volume up, as it slows my typing down ;^}.
Unless your talking about something different than I am interpreting.
>It frequently bombs upon exit, and when it doesn't, will often lock up
>subsequent applications (such as Uniterm). I just make sure I reboot every
>time I exit WP -- no big deal, since it's not the sort of program you're
>going to be using to dash off a quick note to the net.
> Word Perfect Corp. should probably be chastised slightly for not
>debugging the program a little more thoroughly. (They can make up for it,
>in my books, by making the first upgrade free to current owners.) On the
>other hand, even *with* its current defects WP is by far the best word
>processor available for the ST at the moment; certainly it's very far from
>being "useless", as Pavneet Arora suggests. I don't know about you, but I
>don't think I could have waited much longer for a really decent word processor
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
In this I agree totally. WP has become my defacto standard W/P no
matter what or how big whatever I am going to write is. I love it.....
>for my ST.
>
>BBB
>
>Bob Bright <BRIGHT@DALAC.BITNET>
>Philosophy Dept.
>Dalhousie University
>Halifax, NS B3H 3J5
UUCP: {Ihnp4,uwvax}!uwmcsd1!lakesys!rich
Discalimer: The words,ideas,and expressions are my own, and not nessasarily
always correct, and again I re-interate I am not affiliated with Word Perfect.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<384@lakesys.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!umd5!mimsy!oddjob!uwvax!dogie!uwmcsd1!lakesys!richReferences:
<8801162346.AA18389@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!umd5!mimsy!oddjob!uwvax!dogie!uwmcsd1!lakesys!rich From: rich@lakesys.UUCP (Rich Dankert) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: WordPerfects??? Message-ID: <384@lakesys.UUCP> Date: 18 Jan 88 06:44:03 GMT References: <8801162346.AA18389@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Reply-To: rich@lakesys.UUCP (Rich Dankert) Distribution: na Organization: Lake Systems, Milwaukee, WI Lines: 51 Keywords: WP