Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #30321Re: Mega vs 1040ST
From: jmg
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1988 15:34
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1988 15:34
23 lines
1498 bytes
1498 bytes
In article <1425@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> tw@cscosl.UUCP (Thomas Wolf) writes: >Maybe in the near future (?!?) even WE will become worthy of the blitter >chip. Let's all prey (in the general direction of Atari Headquarters) for such >a miracle :-) We pray. Atari might prey (on us). Not all of Europe has the blitter yet! Since I have the floor, metaphorically speaking, I would say that a couple of years ago Atari was well up front, and certainly ahead of Am*ga. However, for the last year we have waited (in vain) for progress such as the Blitter etc., and they have lost their edge. Am*ga, meanwhile, has advanced a lot (even if they are affected by a virus). I don't personally give a $*!t about 68020-based or transputer-based future products: I do care about support and upgrade paths for products that I buy. If I get the impression that a firm sells only different products, each of which is then non-upgradeable to anything else then I start thinking of going elsewhere. Come on, Atari, get that bl**dy blitter out and available to ST users EVERYWHERE.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<612@cernvax.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!cernvax!jmgReferences:
<8801260928.AA28508@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <1425@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!cernvax!jmg From: jmg@cernvax.UUCP (jmg) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Mega vs 1040ST Message-ID: <612@cernvax.UUCP> Date: 28 Jan 88 15:34:10 GMT References: <8801260928.AA28508@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <1425@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> Reply-To: jmg@cernvax.UUCP () Organization: CERN European Laboratory for Particle Physics, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland Lines: 23