Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #30794Re: Bad (but ANY) placing of Atari ST binaries
From: Lee Dickey
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1988 17:20
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1988 17:20
24 lines
1372 bytes
1372 bytes
In article <23660@yale-celray.yale.UUCP> Ram-Ashwin@cs.yale.edu (Ashwin Ram) writes: >In article <4460@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>, jbww@eagle (J.B.W.Webber) writes: >> Surely ANY posting of binaries and source is better than none. > >Yes! > >> Yes, the sources and binary groups are the right place, but I think the >> time has now come to post here, rather than nowhere. > >If the bottleneck is in moderation, why not just make comp.binaries.atari.st >unmoderated and post binaries there? I agree with Richard Lloyd that one >shouldn't need to sift through comp.sys.atari.st just to find programs that one >wants. Surely posting unmoderated binaries to comp.binaries.atari.st is better >than posting unmoderated binaries to comp.sys.atari.st! > I agree. -- L. J. Dickey, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Waterloo. ljdickey@water.waterloo.edu ljdickey@watdcs.BITNET ljdickey@water.UUCP ...!uunet!water!ljdickey
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1432@water.waterloo.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!ljdickeyReferences:
<386@csvax.liv.ac.uk> <4460@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> <23660@yale-celray.yale.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!ljdickey From: ljdickey@water.waterloo.edu (Lee Dickey) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Bad (but ANY) placing of Atari ST binaries Message-ID: <1432@water.waterloo.edu> Date: 24 Feb 88 17:20:55 GMT References: <386@csvax.liv.ac.uk> <4460@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> <23660@yale-celray.yale.UUCP> Reply-To: ljdickey@water.waterloo.edu (Lee Dickey) Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 24