🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <188@forty2.UUCP>, poole@forty2.UUCP (Simon Poole) writes:
> .........I don't doubt the qualities of Atari engineering, but Atari still
> has to show us that they can get an actual product up and going. And as 
> always there is the question of software support, will Atari mangement
> make an official statement about a bug fixed GEMDOS version as an example?
> 

We have recently polled Atari enthusiasts on BIX, Compuserve and GEnie
regarding input on fixes and enhancements for the forthcoming TOS. I
guarantee we won't please everyone, but we'll try. The responses received
have been summarized to about 12 pages. At an average of about 2 lines each,
it runs to around 200 comments. We are very pleased with this level of 
response, as it shows a good degree of cooperation from the user base.
In addition, we have solicited, and received, input from all of our
subsidiaries.
We will publish a list of features on all services as soon as we are confident
of the final content of this next release, together with a summary of the
major changes NOT made, with reasons.

In addition, we recently posted to "misc.jobs.offered" on this net, showing
our intent to hire support/test people directly into Development. These
positions were also posted to the other public services.

We are committed to improving support, not just for the ST/Mega line but
also for the forthcoming 68030/UNIX line. I am sure you all understand that
getting support people with the right mentality to provide pro-active
support, and training them in the peculiar architecture and quirks of the
Atari product line, is not an overnight magical happening.

But happen it will.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roy J. Good
Product Development, Atari Corporation

Views expressed are my own. Atari may agree or disagree; they have the right.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------