Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #31267Re: Atari no-support?
From: Robert Jung
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1988 07:00
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1988 07:00
47 lines
2873 bytes
2873 bytes
In article <2064@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> mpsimon@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (M. Patrick Simon) writes:
> If you have problems
>with your Atari computer, you should sell it and buy a different one, or
>else learn to live with it.
Right. If you don't like the machine, don't use it. I *love* mine.
> How do you expect users to have any hope of
>Atari listening to us if we go on attacking them at the highest levels?
>The "why haven't you fixed this bug yet (these zillion bugs yet!)?" approach
>to applying pressure to Atari might have some chance of success, the "I don't
>like the management/ownership and your mother dresses you funny" approach
>is sure to bring out the "business is war, and you are obviously on the
>wrong side" attitude in any company.
(Taking the opportunity to write for a change, and not get swamped about
hardware tricks:)
To tell the truth, I've never really found a bug in the ST that drove me
nuts (Heck, about the worst bug I've run across is in fsel(), where you
change the drive to B: and you get "[ OK ]" on the pathname line...No big
deal)...However, management-flaming is another thing.
I don't believe in mindlessly flaming just for the sake of flaming.
But when something goes wrong, SOMEbody has to speak out -- Why not us,
the users? My only real gripes right now with Atari is an overall lack of
credibility; Not between me and the company, but between Atari and the rest
of the industry. I want to see Atari/the ST/the Mega/the Abaq/the 8-bits
survive, and when I see something that's "stupid" (to me), such as taking
x months to release a piece of hardware, I get a little depressed...
But random flaming ("Oh, Atari will never get anywhere, the NAME is bad!")
is out...
--R.J.
B-)
>disclaimer: my very own opinion. Ain't nobody responsible.
Bully for you!
______________________________________________________________________________
Bitnet: rjung@castor.usc.edu "Who needs an Amiga?" = == =
= == =
Power WithOUT the Price = == =
===== == =====
Just because it's 8-bits doesn't make it obsolete. ==== == ====
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<486@nunki.usc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ll-xn!oberon!nunki.usc.edu!castor.usc.edu!rjungReferences:
<148leigh@byuvax.bitnet> <2064@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ll-xn!oberon!nunki.usc.edu!castor.usc.edu!rjung From: rjung@castor.usc.edu (Robert Jung) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Atari no-support? Message-ID: <486@nunki.usc.edu> Date: 15 Mar 88 07:00:42 GMT References: <148leigh@byuvax.bitnet> <2064@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> Sender: news@nunki.usc.edu Reply-To: rjung@castor.usc.edu (Robert Jung) Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA Lines: 46 Summary: Bug reports vs. management policies