Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #31667Windowed languages (was Re: LISP Interpreter ???)
From: Robert Jung
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 1988 02:29
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 1988 02:29
47 lines
2804 bytes
2804 bytes
In article <100@obie.UUCP> wes@obie.UUCP (Barnacle Wes) writes:
>In article <588@nunki.usc.edu>, rjung@castor.usc.edu (Robert Jung) writes:
>> Heck, the only *really*good* languages I've seen for ANY computer all
>> don't use windows...
>
>Ah. I take it you've never seen a good Smalltalk system. Or Modula-2
>on a Lilith. Or even C/C++ on a Sun.
No, I must admit I haven't. But of all the windowed languages I've seen on
the ST/Mac/Amoeba, I stand by my statement (Besides, I did say "I've seen",
and not "EVERYTHING'... B-).
>development project, but picture this: a s/w engineering system,
>using windowed micros for terminals and a VAX/VMS or unix mini/micro
>server to hold the on-line text for the requirements doc, the design
>doc, and the source.
>
>You're editing your source code, and you want to take a look at the
>requirement this section of code is derived from. You click on a
>little "handle" in the code window, and another window opens showing
>you the requirement that drives this section. A third window shows
>the design doc section describing this code. Whaddya think?
Extremely neat, and also extremely expensive B-).
I can see the point of a really well-done windowing language, particularly
when you're working on a "big" (relatively speaking) project...Put your
source code in one window, put your output in another, and compare any bugs
that (inevitably) show up... Of course, a tall window (Wow! 80 lines on a
Sun workscreen!) also helps.
Now why doesn't anyone do a programmer-friendly language (C? Pascal?)
like this on the ST? There might be a market... B-)
--R.J.,
shooting the breeze
(And always missing...)
B-)
______________________________________________________________________________
Bitnet: rjung@castor.usc.edu "Who needs an Amiga?" = == =
= == =
Power WithOUT the Price = == =
===== == =====
Just because it's 8-bits doesn't make it obsolete. ==== == ====
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<623@nunki.usc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ll-xn!oberon!nunki.usc.edu!castor.usc.edu!rjungReferences:
<17499@watmath.waterloo.edu> <500@nunki.usc.edu> <86@obie.UUCP> <588@nunki.usc.edu> <100@obie.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ll-xn!oberon!nunki.usc.edu!castor.usc.edu!rjung From: rjung@castor.usc.edu (Robert Jung) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Windowed languages (was Re: LISP Interpreter ???) Message-ID: <623@nunki.usc.edu> Date: 2 Apr 88 02:29:05 GMT References: <17499@watmath.waterloo.edu> <500@nunki.usc.edu> <86@obie.UUCP> <588@nunki.usc.edu> <100@obie.UUCP> Sender: news@nunki.usc.edu Reply-To: rjung@castor.usc.edu (Robert Jung) Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA Lines: 46 Summary: Okay, you got a point