🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <596@lakesys.UUCP>...
           martin@lakesys.UUCP (Martin Wiedmeyer) Writes:
>In article <4564@cup.portal.com> Dave_Ninjajr_Flory@cup.portal.com writes:
>>I used two different disk/file editor programs to try and make the fix to
>>Uniterm xmodem and could not find the sequence described, 06 40 00 FF, I even
>>searched twice for the supposedly correct sequence 02 40 00 FF and it wasn't
>>found either. Looked in both the .PRG file and the .RSC file. Either Simon
>>mad a mistake, or someone fixed it. I was looking at 2.0c edit 008.
>
>I had the same lack of success finding the string in either the .PRG or the
>.RSC file. I was looking in the V2.0c 009, the version which is now available
>on netlib (Thanks, Simon!).
>
>Is it possible that the bug only exists in earlier edits than 008? ... .. .
I had no problem finding and fixing the bug in UniTerm 2.0c 008.
I used a _monitor_ program called MONST to load UniTerm into memory,
find the bug, patch it, and write a new copy of UniTerm back out to disk.

						R. Tim Coslet

Usenet: R_Tim_Coslet@cup.portal.com
BIX:    r.tim_coslet