🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <720@leah.Albany.Edu>, jac423@leah.Albany.Edu (Julius A Cisek) babbles:
> Sure! But keep in mind that the person who originally asked about this
> was not willing to spend more than $200! Also, the REAL Epsons have
> better quality print than any other printer. And most importantly (for
> music prints) it doesn't have those ugly blank lines in the graphix
> mode.

If this is so, why did Migraph do all of their original demo printouts
on a Star SG-10?  Because, in their humble opinions (as the producers
of one of the best ST applications to date, EasyDraw), the SG-10
produced better output than the Espon FX-80.  And cost less, too.  Now
you can buy the NX-10 from Midwest Micro for about $165.  I think this
printer would fit the original posters' bill pretty well.  If you can
afford it, the ND-15 (24-pin) is even better.

Epson printers are rather like IBM computers - they think they're the
best, so they make their prices higher, even when many other companies
offer more REAL performance at a significantly lower price.  You do
own an Atari ST, don't you Mr. Cisek?
-- 
    /\              -  "Against Stupidity,  -    {backbones}!
   /\/\  .    /\    -  The Gods Themselves  -  utah-cs!uplherc!
  /    \/ \/\/  \   -   Contend in Vain."   -   sp7040!obie!
 / U i n T e c h \  -       Schiller        -        wes