🚀 go-pugleaf

,
apratt@atari.UUCP (Allan Pratt) writes:
>From article <490@philmds.UUCP>, by leo@philmds.UUCP (Leo de Wit):
>> null fill (there could be a 1/(vbls/sec) delay %-) and is guaranteed NOT to 
>> work on all ROM versions 8-).
>> The main problem will be the addresses (start, end) of the fill-routine
>> in ROM. 
>
>
>This is appalling! Please get over the idea that you can fool with stuff
>in ROM.  For starters, some programs EXPECT that the whole heap (not
>just the declared BSS) is zeroed at startup...  Microsoft Write is one. 
>Maybe the disk cache you use, or the hard disk compaction utility, or
>something equally deadly expects this -- and you'll learn the hard way
>not to fool with this kind of thing.
>
>I know the clearing takes a long time on 11/20 ROMs.  It's much faster
>in Mega and future ROMs.  But it's still there, because it is a "settled
>expectation" among developers.  ("Settled expectations" are things that
>people count on despite the fact that nobody promised they'd stay true.)
>
>I urge people not to use this trick or any other which changes the
>environment that programs execute in, or depends so heavily on actual
>addresses in ROM. 
>
>============================================
>Opinions expressed above do not necessarily	-- Allan Pratt, Atari Corp.
>reflect those of Atari Corp. or anyone else.	  ...ames!atari!apratt

Why not make it an official then? "Settled expectations" are a hell of a way
to make programming specs. All of the programming languages say don't count
on space in the heap being zero or variables being set to any value before
being init'ed.

UUCP: {cbosgd hplabs!hp-sdd sdcsvax nosc}!crash!pnet01!fred
ARPA: crash!pnet01!fred@nosc.mil
INET: fred@pnet01.cts.com