🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <445@sp7040.UUCP>, jsp@sp7040.UUCP (John Peters) writes:
% In article <9629@eddie.MIT.EDU>, jbs@fenchurch.MIT.EDU (Jeff Siegal) writes:
% <^> In article <2247@sugar.UUCP> peter@sugar.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes:
% <^> >I'll take RSX-11M over VMS any day. t's
% <^> >smaller

% <^> Who cares?  Sure, it's nice to fit a ship into a bottle, but if I'm
% <^> going on a cruise, I'd rather take the QE2 (if I'm trying to get from
% <^> point A to point B, I'll probably take an airplane).

The point is that you can't fit VMS on the ST, but RSX would fit just fine.
The Amiga O/S is very similar to RSX (with a much less chaotic file system),
and it runs just fine on a 68000 with no MMU.

% 	This conversation is quickly leading nowhere.  I'm sorry I
% replied to the person who supports VMS earlier.  If it doesn't apply to
% the ST, this is the wrong place for the discussion.  Lets talk about how
% to improve the ST not fight on which other operating system is best.

Sorry, I thought that's what I was doing. I'm only an ex-STer, but I'm trying
to help.
-- 
-- `-_-' Peter (have you hugged your wolf today?) da Silva.
--   U   Mail to ...!uunet!sugar!peter, flames to /dev/null.
-- "Running DOS on a '386 is like driving an Indy car to the Stop-N-Go"