[No longer about] Re: C++

Article View: comp.sys.atari.st

Article #33806

#33806

From: John R. Dunning
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 1988 18:22

11 lines
834 bytes

    Date:     Sat, 27 Aug 88 08:26 CDT
    From: <KLF1305%TAMVENUS.BITNET@Forsythe.Stanford.EDU>


      On porting gcc to the ST, specifically about the 32 bit ints, I believe
    that Lattice uses 32 bit ints, which is why it is slow compared to the
    other compilers on the market.  I am not sure I would want to try to do
    something as massive as gcc with Lattice C, though.

Why bother with Lattice?  GCC can and does compile itself.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <19880828182218.1.JRD@MOA.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ucbvax!STONY-BROOK.SCRC.SYMBOLICS.COM!jrd

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ucbvax!STONY-BROOK.SCRC.SYMBOLICS.COM!jrd
From: jrd@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.SYMBOLICS.COM (John R. Dunning)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: [No longer about] Re: C++
Message-ID: <19880828182218.1.JRD@MOA.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: 28 Aug 88 18:22:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 11