Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #34769Re: GDOS
From: Robert allen Jung
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 1988 15:05
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 1988 15:05
49 lines
2854 bytes
2854 bytes
In article <10500@cup.portal.com> BobR@cup.portal.com (Bob BobR Retelle) writes:
>pa1132 comments:
> [Lots of stuff about un-scaleability of GDOS fonts deleted]
>
>If you've been used to, say... the way Publishing Partner handles fonts..
>that is, being able to scale them to *ANY* point size, and load them at
>any time, in any order, it may be quite a shock to go to something like
>TimeWorks Publisher which uses GDOS...
With all this (psuedo-)GDOS-bashing, I feel compelled to write something
positive:
The BIG advantage of GDOS's non-scaling fonts feature is that it is FAST.
Comparing 9-pin Epson-compatable printing output speed, GDOS is _faster_ (and
thus, more convient) than Publish Partner and other font-scaling programs.
The reason, of course, is that PP has to calculate how the scaled fonts should
look when you do the printing, whereas GDOS simply looks up a raster map for
its fonts.
When you get into faster printing devices (laser printer...to dream about),
then the speed _really_ becomes noticeable. Neither approach is "good" or
"bad", just different.
(I also want to add that I've been using WordUp for most of my GDOS'ing
[When is the next revision coming out?]...My only gripe with GDOS now is
that I don't have enough RAM <grin> to get even MORE wonderful fonts on my
system at once...)
>If you're stuck using GDOS, opt for G+PLUS instead...
To tell you the darn truth, I don't see much of an improvement in speed
with G+PLUS. Maybe WordUp is using an optimized assembly route for updating
the screen display, but when I used a demo version of G+PLUS with it, I see
no appreciable (to me) speed increase.
(Now, if CodeHead could have made my printer print faster...)
--R.J.
B-)
P.S. Is it just me, or would "HeadCode Software" been a better company name?
B-)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: These are my views, and mine alone.
# ## #
Mailing address: Beats me, just reply to this message # ## #
(rjung@nunki.usc.edu?) ## ## ##
#### ## ####
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1755@nunki.usc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!yunexus!geac!syntron!jtsv16!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!elroy!aero!sm.unisys.com!oberon!nunki.usc.edu!sal42.usc.edu!rjungReferences:
<650@sdcc15.UUCP> <10335@cup.portal.com> <657@sdcc15.UUCP> <10500@cup.portal.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!yunexus!geac!syntron!jtsv16!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!elroy!aero!sm.unisys.com!oberon!nunki.usc.edu!sal42.usc.edu!rjung From: rjung@sal42.usc.edu (Robert allen Jung) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: GDOS Message-ID: <1755@nunki.usc.edu> Date: 27 Oct 88 15:05:24 GMT Article-I.D.: nunki.1755 References: <650@sdcc15.UUCP> <10335@cup.portal.com> <657@sdcc15.UUCP> <10500@cup.portal.com> Sender: news@nunki.usc.edu Reply-To: rjung@sal42.usc.edu (Robert allen Jung) Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA Lines: 48