Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #35122Re: illegal instructions
From: Allan Pratt
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 1988 18:24
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 1988 18:24
14 lines
1225 bytes
1225 bytes
In article <881116021045.085584@DOCKMASTER.ARPA> Cothrell@DOCKMASTER.ARPA writes: > Well, I just tried to get cute and replace the 68000 in my 1040 with a > 68010. Didn't work. No kidding. The 68010's stack frame format for all exceptions is different from the 68000's. This means there is an extra word between the stack pointer and the arguments to a GEMDOS, BIOS, or XBIOS call made from Super mode. It is possible to write code which deals with this situation, and in fact it's been done here by way of prototyping, but at this point it isn't planned for TOS 1.4. ============================================ Opinions expressed above do not necessarily -- Allan Pratt, Atari Corp. reflect those of Atari Corp. or anyone else. ...ames!atari!apratt
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1236@atari.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!uwmcsd1!marque!uunet!portal!atari!aprattReferences:
<881116021045.085584@DOCKMASTER.ARPA>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!uwmcsd1!marque!uunet!portal!atari!apratt From: apratt@atari.UUCP (Allan Pratt) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: illegal instructions Message-ID: <1236@atari.UUCP> Date: 17 Nov 88 18:24:07 GMT References: <881116021045.085584@DOCKMASTER.ARPA> Reply-To: apratt@atari.UUCP (Allan Pratt) Organization: Atari (US) Corporation, Sunnyvale, California Lines: 14