Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #36966Re: lc
From: John Stanley
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 1989 08:04
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 1989 08:04
14 lines
1106 bytes
1106 bytes
[jangr@microsoft.UUCP (Jan Gray) writes...] > For exploring the file system, lc is superior to ls. For shell scripts, > lc is all but useless. Thus lc is the antithesis of proper UNIX tools. > Even so, it is a good bet that a clone of lc can be found on any machine > that a Waterloo-raised UNIX zealot uses. Accept no substitutes. Alright already. Enough... If someone (anyone) will send me full information on the options and what the different formats look like I'll take a shot at writing it for the ST... --- John Stanley <dynasoft!john@stag.UUCP> Software Consultant / Dynasoft Systems
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0208890304040567@dynasoft.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!yunexus!torsqnt!dptcdc!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!ncar!tank!shamash!com50!pwcs!stag!dynasoft!johnShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!yunexus!torsqnt!dptcdc!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!ncar!tank!shamash!com50!pwcs!stag!dynasoft!john From: dynasoft!john@stag.UUCP (John Stanley) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: lc Message-ID: <0208890304040567@dynasoft.UUCP> Date: 8 Mar 89 08:04:04 GMT Article-I.D.: dynasoft.0208890304040567 Reply-To: dynasoft!john@stag.UUCP (John Stanley) Organization: DynaSoft Systems, Minneapolis, MN. Lines: 14 X-Member-Of: STdNET (ST Developer's Network)