Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #37122TOS 1.4 vs NEODESK and UIS-II
From: Greg Csullog
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 1989 19:06
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 1989 19:06
24 lines
1353 bytes
1353 bytes
One net user replied to my original posting as follows: <Date: 11 Mar 89 02:57:44 GMT <From: rochester!rit!ultb!clf3678@cu-arpa.cs.cornell.edu (C.L. Freemesser) <Subject: Re: TOS 1.4 vs NEODESK and UIS-II <To: info-atari16@score.stanford.edu <Why would you want TOS 1.4 instead of UIS or NeoDesk? <Because it is in ROM, and doesn't take up 300k like ALL the other <hundreds of programs you need. If you have a Mega 2, memory concerns <aren't as great as us folks with 520's and a meg upgrade. DISKFREE = 1K UIS-II = 23K NEODESK = 28K (shell while an app is running) While I'm not sure of overhead, these TSRs take < 50K or RAM. I use them on my 1040 (equal to your 520 upgraded) as well as my Mega. Memory is not a problem and no excuse for not getting these codes in lieu of TOS 1.4. Even when I use MULTIDESK and go way beyond the 128K or RAM for ACCs I have no memory shortages on my 1040 and I run apps like Timeworks DTP, dbMAN, LDW.....
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8903150015.AA29917@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!AECLCR.BITNET!01659Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!AECLCR.BITNET!01659 From: 01659@AECLCR.BITNET (Greg Csullog) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: TOS 1.4 vs NEODESK and UIS-II Message-ID: <8903150015.AA29917@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: 14 Mar 89 19:06:00 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 24