Re: TOS 1.4 vs NEODESK and UIS-II

Article View: comp.sys.atari.st

Article #37155

#37155

From: C.L. Freemesser
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1989 21:06

13 lines
981 bytes

When I said "300k", I was being a bit sarcastic.

Still, I would rather have TOS 1.4 and all the free RAM I can get than
have to sacrifice memory for programs like UIS and NEODESK.

I also don't understand how you can say that NeoDesk only uses 28k.  My
understanding is that it uses 128k or so.  Maybe I'm wrong because I
never had any interest in the program.

What about the other programs to fix the 40 file folder limit, the time
stamp fix, etc?  Those add up.

=cf=

Technical Details

Message-ID: <446@ultb.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!rochester!rit!ultb!clf3678

References: <8903150015.AA29917@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!rochester!rit!ultb!clf3678
From: clf3678@ultb.UUCP (C.L. Freemesser)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: TOS 1.4 vs NEODESK and UIS-II
Summary: The wonderful world of kludge
Message-ID: <446@ultb.UUCP>
Date: 15 Mar 89 21:06:36 GMT
References: <8903150015.AA29917@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: clf3678@ultb.UUCP (C.L. Freemesser (709ITP))
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Information Systems
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message