Re: PACK vs. reserved header elements ?

Article View: comp.sys.atari.st

Article #3789

#3789

From: Jwahar R. Bammi
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 1989 04:47

15 lines
1246 bytes

In article <1051@pcsbst.UUCP>, roland@cochise writes:
>In article <4756@brains.UUCP> george_seto%brains@iisat.UUCP writes:
>>
>   Can anybody ( Allan, please! ) tell me what is the meaning of this field
>   ( the longword following symb_size ) and/or why TC uses it ???

if it is the second longword following symb_size that is non-zero, then
TC is using a (yet undocumented i guess) feature of TOS 1.4. If this
long has its lowest bit set, then when launching a process TOS will not
clear all of TPA, just the BSS area. If it is zero, then it will behave
as normal, ie. clear all of TPA including the BSS area of the process.
--
bang:   {any internet host}!dsrgsun.ces.CWRU.edu!bammi	jwahar r. bammi
domain: bammi@dsrgsun.ces.CWRU.edu
GEnie:	J.Bammi

Technical Details

Message-ID: <549@cwjcc.CWRU.Edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!dsrgsun.ces.cwru.edu

References: <1051@pcsbst.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!dsrgsun.ces.cwru.edu
From: bammi@dsrgsun.ces.cwru.edu (Jwahar R. Bammi)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: PACK vs. reserved header elements ?
Message-ID: <549@cwjcc.CWRU.Edu>
Date: 8 Sep 89 04:47:50 GMT
References: <1051@pcsbst.UUCP>
Sender: news@cwjcc.CWRU.Edu
Reply-To: bammi@dsrgsun.ces.cwru.edu (Jwahar R. Bammi)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
Lines: 15
In-reply-to: roland@cochise

Reply to Parent Message