Re: assemblers

Article View: comp.sys.atari.st

Article #38461

#38461

From: Some call me...Tim
Date: Wed, 03 May 1989 22:24

22 lines
1295 bytes

In article <1837@blake.acs.washington.edu> bissiri@blake.acs.washington.edu (Moja Fritzah) writes:
>Does anybody care to respond: WHat is your favourite assembler, and why?

MadMac in the Atari Developer's kit, for one reason:  Speed.

I've seen MadMac assemble three files, link them, and run them from
a hard disk in about three seconds.

It's code isn't "optimized."  What this means is that branches don't
get cut to short branches.

Therefore each branch you use takes up 4 bytes instead of two.
EXCEPT, of course, if you include an extension (bra.s or bra.b),
in which case the branch is forced to short.

And if you really want it optimized--after you have it running, use
the Alcyon assembler at that point.  They are completely code
compatible.

------------
Tim Mensch
Internet: tmensch@ucsd.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <99@sdcc10.ucsd.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ucsd!sdcc6!sdcc10!cs163afu

References: <1837@blake.acs.washington.edu> <534@TSfR.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ucsd!sdcc6!sdcc10!cs163afu
From: cs163afu@sdcc10.ucsd.EDU (Some call me...Tim)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: assemblers
Message-ID: <99@sdcc10.ucsd.EDU>
Date: 3 May 89 22:24:23 GMT
References: <1837@blake.acs.washington.edu> <534@TSfR.UUCP>
Reply-To: cs163afu@sdcc10.ucsd.edu.UUCP (Some call me...Tim)
Organization: University of California, San Diego
Lines: 22

Reply to Parent Message