🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #39210

Laser C vs. MWC

#39210
From: Brian J Denheyer
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 1989 18:50
11 lines
903 bytes
I'm taking a poll which may be of interest to users of Mark Williams C.
I have MWC but I am amazed at the compile times of Laser C.  Is there anybody
out there who has used both and has any comments about whether I should
stick with MWC and hope for speed improveming upgrades or invest some hard earned money
in Laser C ??!!   (I currently have MWC 3.0.6 and CSD) 

The criteria is not only speed but the general programming envrionment of each package.

Please let me know what you think.

Brian Denheyer
Technical Details
Message-ID: <43a747da.b13d@basil.engin.umich.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!caen.engin.umich.edu!bdenh

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!caen.engin.umich.edu!bdenh
From: bdenh@caen.engin.umich.edu (Brian J Denheyer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Laser C vs. MWC
Keywords: c laser mark williams
Message-ID: <43a747da.b13d@basil.engin.umich.edu>
Date: 5 Jun 89 18:50:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: U of M Engineering, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Lines: 11