Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #39210Laser C vs. MWC
From: Brian J Denheyer
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 1989 18:50
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 1989 18:50
11 lines
903 bytes
903 bytes
I'm taking a poll which may be of interest to users of Mark Williams C. I have MWC but I am amazed at the compile times of Laser C. Is there anybody out there who has used both and has any comments about whether I should stick with MWC and hope for speed improveming upgrades or invest some hard earned money in Laser C ??!! (I currently have MWC 3.0.6 and CSD) The criteria is not only speed but the general programming envrionment of each package. Please let me know what you think. Brian Denheyer
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<43a747da.b13d@basil.engin.umich.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!caen.engin.umich.edu!bdenhShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!caen.engin.umich.edu!bdenh From: bdenh@caen.engin.umich.edu (Brian J Denheyer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Laser C vs. MWC Keywords: c laser mark williams Message-ID: <43a747da.b13d@basil.engin.umich.edu> Date: 5 Jun 89 18:50:00 GMT Distribution: usa Organization: U of M Engineering, Ann Arbor, Mich. Lines: 11