Re: Line F again

Article View: comp.sys.atari.st

Article #39689

#39689

From: Buce Szablak
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1989 17:58

12 lines
1015 bytes

In article <8912200800.AA14560@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>, VBRANDT@DBNUAMA1.BITNET writes:
# >No RAM TOS is supported by Atari (at this time) and most are
# >illegal copies, making their users pirates, so it's not that great a
# >hardship.
# 
#    A side note to Allan:  Take the ROM TOS 1.4, disassemble it, make it fully
# relocatable, write a little RAM loader, and you have a RAM TOS. Does that make
# me a pirate???

I use my RAM TOS obtained when I bought my ST to run programs that won't
run under TOS 1.4. Anyone who bought their ST before the ROMS were available
(pre 1040 days) got a TOS on disk.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <894@lzaz.ATT.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!think!mintaka!mit-eddie!rutgers!att!dptg!lzaz!bds

References: <8912200800.AA14560@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!think!mintaka!mit-eddie!rutgers!att!dptg!lzaz!bds
From: bds@lzaz.ATT.COM (Buce Szablak)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Line F again
Message-ID: <894@lzaz.ATT.COM>
Date: 20 Dec 89 17:58:12 GMT
References: <8912200800.AA14560@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Organization: AT&T BL Middletown/Lincroft NJ USA
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message