Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #39858Re: Unexpandable megas
From: Mark F. Newton
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1989 08:45
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1989 08:45
27 lines
1279 bytes
1279 bytes
Gee whiz... All this bashing (will it ever end? Do they have this on c.s.amiga??) Let's see, business can change a design anytime they want, due to a number of reasons, like perhaps a better design, less expensive to make, etc. So what if Atari uses two separate board designs? Who care? Why waste our time (and money) crying about the little things? SIMMs? Maybe again, Atari has gotten better pricing on memory chips with SIMMS rather than DRAMS. **WHO CARES???** Why are you crying about why someone uses a particular type of memory chip? Does it *really, really* matter that my 4 Megabytes are DRAMS, and an STE uses 1Mb in SIMMs??? Sore ja da-cha, Shinobu -- Sakura-mento, CA mmsac!sactoh0!mfolivo mfolivo@sactoh0 pacbell!sactoh0!mfolivo (they're worth a try...)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2334@sactoh0.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!ames!pacbell!sactoh0!mfolivoReferences:
<8912120805.AA00886@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <370009@acf5.NYU.EDU> <25353@cup.portal.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!ames!pacbell!sactoh0!mfolivo From: mfolivo@sactoh0.UUCP (Mark F. Newton) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Unexpandable megas Summary: Oh please, spare us. (Another whiner) Message-ID: <2334@sactoh0.UUCP> Date: 26 Dec 89 08:45:40 GMT References: <8912120805.AA00886@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <370009@acf5.NYU.EDU> <25353@cup.portal.com> Organization: Sacramento Public Access, Ca. USA Lines: 27