🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <37824@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> kclenden@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Kevin Clendenien) writes:
>
>FREE?????  I think not Mr. Covert.  Why do you think that Apple 
>computers with similar options to Atari computers cost about
>twice as much?  One reason is because Apple is committed to
>providing information about those computers.  Of course they
>have to pay someone to do that, so they just charge more
>up front to cover the cost later.  The information you're
>getting is not free, but only appears to be free.  Why do 
>you own Atari equipment?  Probably because you were able to
>pay less for it up front.  Now you are finding out what you
>gave up.  For a lot of people this alternative makes sense.  I
>know it does for me.  If you would consistently use a calm,
>gentle tone when asking questions, instead of the impatient,
>whinning tone that you have demonstrated time and time again,
>you would probably get more answers.  For free, even...

Well, I used to think like this too.  I figured, "Great, I save few bucks
now and I figure out all the little problems on my own and put up with
a lot of ragged software."  This was all well and good until I actually
got a Mac IIcx.  Now I have speed, support from the manufacturer, oodles
of support from third party software companies and hardware companies,
easy RAM upgrades, easy hardware add-ons, etc.  Now that I have one,
I think it was worth the up-front cost to avoid all the later 
exasperation and disappointment.  Anyway, I guess the old addage holds
true:  You get what you pay for.

p.s.  Richard, lighten up.  :-)

Chris
------------------------------+---------------------------
Chris Mauritz                 |Where there's a BEER,
cmm1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu   |there's a plan.
(c)All rights reserved.       |
Send flames to /dev/null      |Need I say more?
------------------------------+---------------------------