🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <22440@cup.portal.com> Xorg@cup.portal.com (Peter Ted Szymonik) writes:
>I'll tell you the real nifty part - the Mac 'portable' weighs in at a
>hefty 16 pounds!  Its also phically a lot larger than the STacy. And
>to really make life interesting, a picture of the STacy and mention of
>GCR is made in the latest issue of MacUser magazine!  Nice free ad or
>what?  Now all they need is to pump those babies out to a waiting Mac
>world.
>
>Peter Szymonik
>Xorg@cup.portal.com

From every review that I've read, the STacy weights in at 15 lbs.  Not much
of a difference, I would say.

Also, the Macintosh Portable runs at 16 Mhz and the active-matrix screen is
*nice*.  Super fast with no blurring at all and an 180 degree viewing angle.

A single charge will keep the machine running from 6-12 hours and has an
inactive mode in which the processor is kicked down to 1 Mhz to keep battery
drain to a minimum.

Of course, the thing lists for ~$6500.  Still, I'd bet everything that Apple
will not be able to keep up with demand for the first few months.

-- 
           Henry Kwan - FWB, Inc.         |  "Experience varies directly
     claris!wet!logic@ames.arc.nasa.gov   |    with equipment ruined."
    cca.ucsf.edu!wet!logic@cgl.ucsf.edu   |
  {claris,ucsfcca,hoptoad,lamc}!wet!logic |              -- Tech Support