Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #6404Re: Shareware MAC
From: GREG TRICE
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1989 14:30
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1989 14:30
13 lines
1077 bytes
1077 bytes
Why does everybody assume that a Mac emulator has to use Mac ROMs or any Mac code at all? There are an infinite number of ways to do a given job and it is perfectly possible for somebody to carefully read all the Mac documentation and then sit down and write code that will do exactly the same job as the Mac roms, but have not a byte in common with them in code. This is the situation with most IBM compatible systems. Though they are functionally identical to the IBM product, their ROMs contain different, but functionally identical code. It should be perfectly possible to produce a Mac emulator that used no ROMs at all, but was wholly disk based (given sufficient memory to hold the quondam ROM code in RAM). --- * Via ProDoor 3.1R
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<89120107511652@masnet.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!masnet!canremote!greg.triceShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!masnet!canremote!greg.trice From: greg.trice@canremote.uucp (GREG TRICE) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Shareware MAC Message-ID: <89120107511652@masnet.uucp> Date: 29 Nov 89 14:30:00 GMT Organization: Canada Remote Systems Limited, Mississauga, ON, Canada Lines: 13