🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1226@psu-cs.UUCP> kirkenda@psu-cs.UUCP (Steve Kirkendall) writes:
>In article <1683@netmbx.UUCP> hase@netmbx.UUCP (Hartmut Semken) writes:
>>In article <17702@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> acm@cs.ucla.edu writes:
>>>I have a comment.  Why not adopt MINIX as that new OS?  

{ part deleted }

>
>One problem with Minix: It is not freely redistributable.  Cheap, yes; free, no.
>I suspect a PD operating system would have a much better chance of catching on;
>can you imagine a typical Atari salesman explaining to a typical Atari customer
>why s/he should spend money to replace something as technical as an OS?
>
{ part deleted }
>
>I like the Minix idea, or a PD *NIX clone.
>
>Hey, Atari!  What kind of support would you be willing to give to a project
>like this?  Yes, I understand that you all think TOS 1.4 is the greatest thing
>since 3.5" disks... but DEC feels the same way about VMS, and a lot of us
>customers want an alternative.  Please post a response.
>
>		-- Steve Kirkendall


Well everybody if you feel like dropping the floppy-disc OS one 
might consider GNU when it becomes ready. It is supposed to
be a full-blown UNIX type operating system with all the utilities
one might need. It will probably demand something like 1.5-2MB ram
in its initial form but that might be possible to change.
It has preparations to make people unable to restrict further distribution.
-- 
WHOAMI : Per Andersson
WHERE  : Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
UUCP   : perand@tds.kth.se
SUNET  : perand@meta.sunet.se, meta::perand