Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #5209computer purchase decision
From: Brandon G. Lovested
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1989 01:12
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1989 01:12
58 lines
3026 bytes
3026 bytes
Well, after examining the response to my MIDI question, the general
chatter in the comp.sys.atari.st news, and, more than any other single
person, Richard Covert, I have decided *not* to buy an Atari anything.
Atari has had its head stuck [...] since before I used to sell the 800/400's
eight years ago. I have no doubt that there are innovative people working
at Atari, but the _machine_ that is the structure of the company is slow,
inefficient, and lacks focus.
BUSINESS__
Atari will *never* be considered a business computer. They shouldn't attempt
to wear that label. They could, however, actively `interface' with what's
going on in the business world in order to support those users who require
both what the Atari is good at, as well as business-type applications (e.g.:
spreadsheets).
Atari has a name for games; an arena they've been thrown out of by Nintendo.
Atari has a name for graphics, though not quite as good as Amiga, & Mac II.
Atari has a name for sound. MIDI built in is a nice feature, but unless this
is your exclusive use, there are better systems out (even in terms of
cost-effectiveness). These shortcomings can all be overcome, though. TT? ATW?
THE_CRUX__
What Atari also has a name for (over 8 years) is poor support, both for the
users/developers, and the stores who sell their products. Let's focus on the
business & marketing people, as well as whatever Tramiel is `in charge'. This
general area is where the heart of the problem lies. And frankly, yes, I do
think I could do better. Judging from the talk here, so do many others.
Marketing has done a very bad job. With no focus, what is their target?
It is possible to design and build a wonderful, wonderful system, but the
engineers don't decide what to build. That's under the direction of the
upper echelon.
RECAPPING__
Well, I didn't want this to be a novella. I just thought a better focus
for criticism (well deserved) would be the "decision makers."
Simply put:
Atari,
You blew it.
================================================================================
|
Brandon G. Lovested | "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped,
| indexed, briefed, debriefed, or numbered!
brandonl@amadeus.WR.TEK.COM | My life is my own."
|
================================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<519@wrgate.WR.TEK.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!wrgate!amadeus!brandonlShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!wrgate!amadeus!brandonl From: brandonl@amadeus.WR.TEK.COM (Brandon G. Lovested) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: computer purchase decision Message-ID: <519@wrgate.WR.TEK.COM> Date: 25 Oct 89 01:12:24 GMT Sender: nobody@wrgate.WR.TEK.COM Reply-To: brandonl@amadeus.WR.TEK.COM (Brandon G. Lovested) Distribution: usa Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR. Lines: 58