🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #2129

quickindex DMA transfer observations.

#2129
From: Frans Meulenbroeks
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 1989 07:08
28 lines
1387 bytes
Hi!

Yesterday I noticed something peculiar with respect to the quickindex
program (that is qindex15.prg).

I wanted to compare my new hard disk with the floppy drive, by
means of testing the DMA transfer rate using qindex15.

The results were amazing:
partition C does about 8300 %
partition D and E do about 5600 %

The drive in question was just formatted.
Why is there a difference for the various partitions?
Is this due to the algorithm? the disk?
the way partitions are placed on the disk with respect to cylinders
etc?

(Side question: will a partition always contain only complete
 tracks? or even complete cylinders??)

I'm totally puzzled with this. 
Of course 5600 % is ok, but 8300 % is definitely more likable.

regards,
Frans Meulenbroeks        (meulenbr@cst.prl.philips.nl)
	Centre for Software Technology
	( or try: ...!mcvax!phigate!prle!cst!meulenbr)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <541@prles2.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!phigate!prle!prles2!cstw01!meulenbr

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!phigate!prle!prles2!cstw01!meulenbr
From: meulenbr@cstw01.prl.philips.nl (Frans Meulenbroeks)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: quickindex DMA transfer observations.
Message-ID: <541@prles2.UUCP>
Date: 30 Jun 89 07:08:23 GMT
Sender: nobody@prles2.UUCP
Reply-To: meulenbr@cstw01.prl.philips.nl ()
Organization: Centre for Software Technology, Philips Eindhoven
Lines: 28