🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <8911140141.AA02948@NARNIA.SAIC.COM> steveg@SAIC.COM (Stephen Harold Goldstein) writes:
	.
	.
	.
>I'm sick and tired of all the TT flames and Atari bashing going on.
	.
	.
	.
>Greg Lindahl has been just about the only voice of reason here, and now
>he gets flamed.  Shheeesh!  (I'm with you Greg!)

Finally, a message that isn't a flame !!!  Isn't this heat getting old
already.  If you not happy with Atari, why tell us.  We've been there.
Go tell someone who wants to hear it.  Me ??? I want some information about
the Atari ST computer.  Not complaints about the company !!!

Make that three of us and probably a lot more who are tired of all the 
griping.
	.
	.
	.
>. . .  I made a careful decision about what
>I was getting for my money.  I knew Atari's reputation for support
>(or lack thereof), and factored that in.  I also knew Atari's 
>reputation for building solid, quality hardware.  I have *NEVER*
>had any hardware problems with any of my Atari equipment.  I now have
	.
	.
	.
>
>                       <*heavy sigh of relief*>
>
>Alternate proposal:  How about comp.sys.atari.tech for serious technical 
>                     discussions and exchanges of information in a 
>                     civilized manner?
>

Nah !!! Let's just clean up our act on this group.  How about it, I won't
complain if you don't !!!  

I really would like for this to be a worthwhile group.  If it turns into an
Atari bashing group it could die under its own weight.

Let's not let that happen. 

>Please send all flames to alt.flames where I'll be happy to ignore them.
>Constructive criticisms and discussion always welcome.
>
>Stephen Goldstein     steveg@saic.com
>My first Atari system? A 24K Atari 800, Rev. A ROMS, C(not G)TIA graphics
>Disclaimer:  That's not what I said.



Thanks Stephen

mike