🚀 go-pugleaf

>The disk tests were: write 64 512-byte blocks, read the blocks
>sequentially, and read the blocks randomly.
>
>The results were (in seconds):
>		Mac Plus	ST	Amiga
>write		  2.3		30.3	7.3
>seq read	  1.1		15.9	5.1
>random read	  4.6		14.2	17.8

	Of course you realize that these speeds _can_ be greatly improved
upon.  Generic benchmarks are really annoying, you know?  The best bench-
mark, in my opinion, would take the best possible speeds for each machine.
And it's not like you have to roll up your sleeves and hijack the FPC either.
Some guy I know wrote his own benchmark doing exactly the above, but
with a 32K buffer, and the time went down to somewhere in between the Mac
Plus and the Amiga.
-- 
				- Jonathan Fischer 	(jafischer@watrose)
		or:   	watmath!watrose!jafischer
		or:   	jafischer%watrose@waterloo.csnet
		or:  	jafischer%watrose@waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa