🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <90004.202106IMS103@PSUVM.BITNET>, <IMS103@PSUVM.BITNET> says:
>IBM does not make Apple software,  Commodore does not make IBM software,
>Apple does not make Atari software,  Hewlett Packard does not make
>C64 software, but Atari makes Amiga software.  Atari is just wasting
>time and enegry that they could use elsewhere like fixing bugs, updating
>computers and bringing out software for their *own* computer systems.
>
>--
>Ian Smith <ims103@psuvm.bitnet>
>"And a word of advice, don't sell your company to Atari."
>                                                          - RJ Michal
>
I'm not against Atari writing software for other platforms, and I don't
think it signals the "flop" of the ST.  However, Ian makes a good point.
Atari is a small company and has limited resources.  I too would prefer
that they devote their energies to the support of their current line
and the development of future products.  I believe that would be of
greater long-term benifit to Atari than insuring that the Amiga has an
an authentic port of Gauntlet...

BTW, who is "RJ Michal"?

This is my first post, so a fancy signature will have to wait.  Happy
New Year, everybody!

Steve Plite <splite@mtus5.bitnet>