Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #27492Re: Disk R/W times for large files
From: egisin
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1987 19:25
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1987 19:25
19 lines
1492 bytes
1492 bytes
In article <1643@?>, braner@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu (braner) writes:
> But my experiments (when modifying microEmacs, etc) show that, with typical
> text files (<50K), a buffer of 9K (one DS track) yields a performance that
> is very close to that of larger buffers. That is with standard
> ("slow") formatted disks. (The performance gradually levels off as you
> increase the buffer size through 4.5, 9 and 18K.)
There isn't any point in making IO buffers a multiple of the
track size when using gemdos IO; it is unlikely the file begins at side 0, sector 1.
Making the buffer large is what matters.
I've been using disks formatted with 10 sector/track, and
was wondering if this is within the specs for the floppy controller,
or outside IBM specs, or what. Has anyone had problems with this format?
Does anyone have some C code that does floppy IO at the controller level.
I want to do a "track read". (I don't want assembler, I can get that
from the bios listing).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9682@orchid.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!orchid!egisinReferences:
<383@uop.UUCP> <781@atari.UUCP> <1643@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!orchid!egisin From: egisin@orchid.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Disk R/W times for large files Message-ID: <9682@orchid.UUCP> Date: Fri, 10-Jul-87 15:25:14 EDT Article-I.D.: orchid.9682 Posted: Fri Jul 10 15:25:14 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 11-Jul-87 13:40:41 EDT References: <383@uop.UUCP> <781@atari.UUCP> <1643@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> Sender: egisin@orchid.UUCP Lines: 19