🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <27151@ut-emx.UUCP> kjm@ut-emx.UUCP writes:
>In article <3792@tahoe.unr.edu>,
lsmith@unssun.nevada.edu (LARRY SMITH) writes:
>> is being replaced with an IBM 3090.
>
>I can't imagine how that could possibly be an improvement...  No matter
>what the IBM is running.

Hum, for quite a while (pre-U*), I was very impressed with developments
I saw throughout IBM: third party software like Wylbur, in house
software like the SPF, numerous languages and packages, user group help,
what did I uses CDCs for?  Speed, pure raw speed (Thorton's book)
[languages? ha! (yes yes yes, I know your line, I sat on the Pascal
Standards Committee)].  Yes, IBM has got some fine software/products:
like EPISLE.  Manuals which one could devel through and fix a machine!
Yes, fine, company, IBM.  Maker of business machines, and they mean
business. 8)

Another gross generalization from

--eugene miya, NASA Ames Research Center, eugene@aurora.arc.nasa.gov
  resident cynic at the Rock of Ages Home for Retired Hackers:
--
  "You trust the `reply' command with all those different mailers out there?"
  "If my mail does not reach you, please accept my apology."
  {ncar,decwrl,hplabs,uunet}!ames!eugene
  Do you expect anything BUT generalizations on the net?
  [If it ain't source, it ain't software -- D. Tweten]