Article View: comp.sys.celerity
Article #24Info on Celerity 6000 (please)
From: johnw
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1987 22:57
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1987 22:57
23 lines
1343 bytes
1343 bytes
I (we) saw the announcement, shich sounds very exciting,
and are now *VERY* interested in finding more information!
1: Is the 60MFLOPS for the 1kx1k "any method" linpak
done in 32 or 64 bit presision ????
1.5: If Single, what are the Double rates ???
2: We *DESPARATELY* want timeings for the LLNL loop set
(24 prefered)
3: Does anyone have any timings for any other benchmarks,
specifially the "normal-LINPAK" and "DoDuc"
4: Any real numbers for *ANY* benchmarks would be appreciated!
(Yes, we'll even take drystones.....)
--
John Wardale
... {seismo | harvard | ihnp4} ! {uwvax | cs.wisc.edu} ! astroatc!johnw
To err is human, to really foul up world news requires the net!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<529@astroatc.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sunybcs!bingvaxu!leah!uwmcsd1!uwmacc!uwvax!astroatc!johnwReferences:
<15814@topaz.rutgers.edu> <489@celerity.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sunybcs!bingvaxu!leah!uwmcsd1!uwmacc!uwvax!astroatc!johnw From: johnw@astroatc.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.celerity Subject: Info on Celerity 6000 (please) Message-ID: <529@astroatc.UUCP> Date: Wed, 28-Oct-87 17:57:26 EST Article-I.D.: astroatc.529 Posted: Wed Oct 28 17:57:26 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 1-Nov-87 02:31:19 EST References: <15814@topaz.rutgers.edu> <489@celerity.UUCP> Reply-To: johnw@astroatc.UUCP (John F. Wardale) Organization: Astronautics Technology Cntr, Madison, WI Lines: 23