Article View: comp.sys.dec.micro
Article #1065Differences between an ST-225 and an RD31 (was Re: Rainbow 100+)
From: Charles Lasner
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 18:59
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 18:59
31 lines
2410 bytes
2410 bytes
In article <1992Dec11.231842.1775@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> tom@afthree.as.arizona.edu (Thomas J. Trebisky) writes: > As to whether an >RD-31 is actually a DEC relabelled St225, probably, but who knows! I do! I have them both right here: ST-225 has a ground clip in the back for a standard narrow fast-on. For some unknown reason DEC ordered the drives without it. The DM II sometimes was shipped with an explanation that it was OK to leave the ground wire already in place dangling! RD31 has an insulating layer applied to the top surface in a few square inches in an odd pattern. I now know why: when the drive is used, such as in a DECmate III+ where an RX33 (TEAC FD55GFR/V) drive is above the hard disk, this is just added security to ensure the floppy board doesn't short out on the hard disk metal surface. If you are careful to always ensure favoring the screws to slightly raise the floppy above the hard disk, there is no problem, alternatively you could apply contact paper to the ST-225 top surface to accomplish pretty much the same thing. ST-225 is a "fat" half-height drive, and some TEAC drives are "fat" also, in the underside region, so tolerances being what they are, this could cause a short circuit. The RD31 is clearly marked as a Seagate ST-225. DEC has the standard flaw chart from Seagate as well. So, if I transplanted the insulating layer and removed the ground clip (which I have since restored in the DEC drive :-)) and transferred all of the bar code stickers, you couldn't tell which is the ST-225 and which is the RD-31. cjl
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec12.185929.22308@news.columbia.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!charnel!rat!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!caen!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.columbia.edu!watsun.cc.columbia.edu!lasnerReferences:
<1992Dec10.003626.599@news.columbia.edu> <1992Dec11.113407.5893@ais.com> <1992Dec11.231842.1775@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!charnel!rat!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!caen!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.columbia.edu!watsun.cc.columbia.edu!lasner From: lasner@watsun.cc.columbia.edu (Charles Lasner) Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec.micro Subject: Differences between an ST-225 and an RD31 (was Re: Rainbow 100+) Message-ID: <1992Dec12.185929.22308@news.columbia.edu> Date: 12 Dec 92 18:59:29 GMT References: <1992Dec10.003626.599@news.columbia.edu> <1992Dec11.113407.5893@ais.com> <1992Dec11.231842.1775@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> Sender: usenet@news.columbia.edu (The Network News) Reply-To: lasner@watsun.cc.columbia.edu (Charles Lasner) Organization: Columbia University Lines: 31 Nntp-Posting-Host: watsun.cc.columbia.edu