Article View: comp.sys.dec.micro
Article #1080OK, so here's another Pathworks problem...
From: System Janitor
Date: Tue, 28 May 1991 15:52
Date: Tue, 28 May 1991 15:52
10 lines
796 bytes
796 bytes
The folks that wrote the tcp-ip transport part of pathworks must be working straight from the RFCs or something (I never thought I'd complain about that!). I believe Pathworks is hardcoded (non-configurable) to broadcast on ones. What about us folks who have big old networks all set up where everyone broadcasts on zeros? -Mike
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991May28.155248.13590@hubcap.clemson.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!ames!ncar!gatech!hubcap!hubcapReferences:
<1991May28.080504.31094@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!ames!ncar!gatech!hubcap!hubcap From: hubcap@hubcap.clemson.edu (System Janitor) Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec.micro,comp.sys.dec Subject: OK, so here's another Pathworks problem... Message-ID: <1991May28.155248.13590@hubcap.clemson.edu> Date: 28 May 91 15:52:48 GMT References: <1991May28.080504.31094@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> Organization: Clemson University Lines: 10