Article View: comp.sys.dec.micro
Article #831Re: EISA Alpha
From: CP/M lives!
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 16:30
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 16:30
16 lines
1264 bytes
1264 bytes
In article <1992Oct8.132005.5768@ais.com>, bruce@ais.com (Bruce C. Wright) writes: > The only reason I can think of to want to run EISA off an Alpha > would be for compatibility, sort of the same reason that there are > Unibus adapters available for many (all?) of the BI-bus VAXen. If > you have oddball board(s) that that don't (yet) have any equivalent > as a "native" board, it may be an attractive interim option. There really aren't that many BI-bus VAXen. The 6000s, for example, only use BI for I/O. And between the XMI-BI adapter and the BI-UNIBUS adapter, the performance out there in UNIBUS-land gets pretty poor. UNIBUS isn't even supported on the high-end machines. What little news I've been getting about the Alpha machines looks discouraging for CSR accesses in general, let alone talking to EISA registers. Roger Ivie ivie@cc.usu.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct9.103048.59564@cc.usu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!cc.usu.edu!ivieReferences:
<1992Oct7.000743.47@otago.ac.nz> <1992Oct6.095841.59463@cc.usu.edu> <1992Oct8.132005.5768@ais.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!cc.usu.edu!ivie From: ivie@cc.usu.edu (CP/M lives!) Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec.micro Subject: Re: EISA Alpha Message-ID: <1992Oct9.103048.59564@cc.usu.edu> Date: 9 Oct 92 10:30:48 MDT References: <1992Oct7.000743.47@otago.ac.nz> <1992Oct6.095841.59463@cc.usu.edu> <1992Oct8.132005.5768@ais.com> Organization: Utah State University Lines: 16