🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.dec
Article #2556

Re: dxpsview malfunction on Ultrix 4.0

#2556
From: Lee Woodbury
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 1990 15:17
52 lines
2691 bytes
In article <744@nvuxl.UUCP> hsong@nvuxl.UUCP (g hugh song) writes:
>Whenever a PostScript file is opened inside "dxpsview" under Ultrix 4.0
>on DecStation 5000/200, I am getting the following message:
>
>X Protocol error detected by server:  BadAlloc - insufficient
>resources
>  Failed request major op code 53 (X_CreatePixmap)
>  Failed request minor op code 0 (if applicable)
>  ResourceID 0xb00074 in failed request (if applicable)
>  Serial number of failed request 920
>  Current serial number in output stream 921
>
>Are you guys having the same problem?  What am I missing? 

Yes!  I discovered, however, that I could make the problem go away by
selecting the "Watch Progress" choice on the Options Menu.  According to
the dxpsview man page:

	Usually, dxpsview prepares and stores an entire
	page in its cache before drawing it. With the
	Watch Progress option on, dxpsview displays images
	immediately as it prepares them.  

So it sounds like they've got a serious bug in a call to
malloc (or XMalloc) somewhere, and selecting this item merely
avoids (as opposed to fixes) it.

Amusingly, it was our DEC rep and a software consultant he'd brought
along who first demonstrated dxpsview (or attempted to) to me after our
workstation (DECstation 5000/200 running 4.0) had been installed.  The
software consultant who was familiar with dxpsview was clearly taken
aback by the BadAlloc bug.

Other than that, by the way, I'm pretty impressed with dxpsview.
I don't have a lot of PostScript viewers under my belt, but
it's the nicest one I've seen.  The only feature I wish it
had was some better debugging facilities (in particular, pstack).

Incidentally, if anyone can give the proper Xresources incantation to
set the 'Watch Progress' option from the .Xdefaults file, I'd be much
obliged.  The man page is a little thin on detail.

>How about "dxpsview" under Ultrix 4.1? 

Don't know.

Leland Woodbury
-- 
ARPANET/INTERNET: leland@cs.columbia.edu
	  USENET: ...!columbia!cs.columbia.edu!leland
	  BITNET: leland%cs.columbia.edu@cuvmb
	  USMAIL: Columbia Univ., 457 CS, 500 W. 120 St., NYC 10027-6699
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1990Dec11.151747.18181@cs.columbia.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cs.columbia.edu!leland
References: <744@nvuxl.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cs.columbia.edu!leland
From: leland@cs.columbia.edu (Lee Woodbury)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec
Subject: Re: dxpsview malfunction on Ultrix 4.0
Keywords: dxpsview
Message-ID: <1990Dec11.151747.18181@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: 11 Dec 90 15:17:47 GMT
References: <744@nvuxl.UUCP>
Reply-To: leland@cs.columbia.edu (Lee Woodbury)
Followup-To: comp.sys.dec
Organization: Columbia University, Dept. of Computer Science, NYC
Lines: 52