Article View: comp.sys.dec
Article #3687Re: VAX BSD final answer...
From: Thor Lancelot Simon
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 04:26
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 04:26
58 lines
2842 bytes
2842 bytes
In article <BzAEsz.Ipy@dscomsa.desy.de> Hallam@zeus02.desy.de writes: >In article <1992Dec14.041235.4661@panix.com>, tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot >Simon) writes: > >|>In article <Byx3D5.326@dscomsa.desy.de> Hallam@zeus02.desy.de writes: >|>>In article <DGRAY.92Dec2000244@menudo.uh.edu>, dgray@menudo.uh.edu (Dennis >|>Gray >|>>Jr.) writes: >|>> >|>>|>It doesn't look like there is a free unix for the vax. That's too >|>>|>bad, since there really isn't a really good OS for the vax anywhere. >|>> >|>>Except of course for VMS which did a decade ago all the things that UNIX has >|>>only just started to. >|> >|>Except of course for VMS, which was as slow and ungainly a decade ago as UNIX >|>has only just started to become. >|> >|>(Now if there were only a TOPS-20 or ITS port for the vax...) > >Problem with O/Ss is that in order to solve everyone's needs they need a lot of >functionality. UNIX got by by offering a very limited amount of functionality >which was exactly what a hacker running simple single user tasks with a minimnum So. UNIX is designed primarily for single-user use? If that's not what you're saying, it sure sounds like it. Mr. Hallam-Baker, you know better. >of complex file handling requirements. > >In the 70's everyone realized that to make databases run fast you had to put >sophisticated data structures onto the disk and handle them in the I/O subsystem >rather than the processor. Nowadays suggesting such systems receives hosts of >flames from the people who have accepted the sequential file structures only >line. Please provide some evidence that your way is better. > >Yep by all means lets replace VMS with something better. But for heavens sake >lets not let UNIX win. If UNIX became the only O/S standard we would never get >anything better. It sounds to me like you can buy what you want from IBM.... > > > >-- > >Phill Hallam-Baker -- ******************************************************************************* *Thor Simon * Okay, just a little pin-prick...There'll be no more-* *tls@panix.COM * Aieeeeaaaugh!-but you may feel a little _sick_. * *tls@spock.UUCP * ---Pink Floyd * *******************************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec22.042603.7952@spock.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!yale!spock!lancelotReferences:
<Byx3D5.326@dscomsa.desy.de> <1992Dec14.041235.4661@panix.com> <BzAEsz.Ipy@dscomsa.desy.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!yale!spock!lancelot From: lancelot@spock.uucp (Thor Lancelot Simon) Subject: Re: VAX BSD final answer... Message-ID: <1992Dec22.042603.7952@spock.UUCP> Sender: usenet@spock.UUCP (Usenet posting daemon) Nntp-Posting-Host: rattle Organization: Choate Rosemary Hall References: <Byx3D5.326@dscomsa.desy.de> <1992Dec14.041235.4661@panix.com> <BzAEsz.Ipy@dscomsa.desy.de> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 04:26:03 GMT Lines: 59