🚀 go-pugleaf

>> ... digitally signed by the vendor for certification*) ...
>
>This technology is export-controlled.

	No it isn't. Encryption for privacy purposes is export controlled.
Encryption for authentication purposes is not. I think that the line is
drawn at where your authentication protocol lets you also do a secret
key exchange. ;)
	The privacy not allowed versus authentication allowed approach
implies that, after all, those that spy on you *WANT* to be able to
prove without a shadow of a doubt that you are you. On the other hand,
they don't want you talking behind their backs. The politics of
encryption discussion more accurately belongs in alt.privacy or
comp.society.privacy.

mjr.
-- 
                                                 "guns don't die. people do."